# Scaleway DEV1-S

[Paris 1](https://www.rackcensus.com/locations/paris-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in Paris")

Benchmark complete

Finished Oct 21, 2026

Geekbench 7 single-core

456

Faster than 5% of 2 vCPU plans

Geekbench 7 multi-core

Skipped

Disk 4K IOPS

25,379

fio random read and write, 50/50

Monthly price at test time

€6.55 EUR

Same price today

## Server

[Scaleway](https://www.rackcensus.com/vps-providers/scaleway-benchmarks)[DEV1-S](https://www.rackcensus.com/plans/2vkdb7-scaleway-dev1-s-benchmarks?location=fr-par-1)

-

Provider

Scaleway

-

Plan

DEV1-S

-

Location

Paris 1

-

vCPU

2

-

RAM

2 GB

-

Storage

20 GB SSD

-

Network

200 Mbps

-

OS image

ubuntu\_noble

-

Trigger

Scheduled

-

Queued at

Oct 19, 2026, 21:43:00 UTC

[Visit Scaleway](https://www.rackcensus.com/go/scaleway)

## Latest runs of this plan

- [Warsaw 1 Oct 25, 2026](https://www.rackcensus.com/benchmarks/ylb02e-scaleway-dev1-s-pl-waw-1-benchmark)1,121
- [Paris 2 Oct 24, 2026](https://www.rackcensus.com/benchmarks/cbdi4s-scaleway-dev1-s-fr-par-2-benchmark)546
- [Amsterdam 1 Oct 22, 2026](https://www.rackcensus.com/benchmarks/1fkv3w-scaleway-dev1-s-nl-ams-1-benchmark)522

[Full history of this plan](https://www.rackcensus.com/plans/2vkdb7-scaleway-dev1-s-benchmarks/history)

## CPU

| Version | Single-core | Multi-core | Result link |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Geekbench 7 | 456 | Skipped | [Geekbench Browser](https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/681082) |

Multi-core was skipped because Geekbench 7 needs about 3.1 GB of free memory to run 2 threads, and this server didn't have that much. Single-core needs much less, so it still ran.

Scores from different Geekbench versions aren't comparable with each other. Charts only use Geekbench 7.

### Geekbench 7 workloads

| Workload | Single-core | Multi-core |
| --- | --- | --- |
| File Compression | 605105th of 112 | Single-core only |
| Navigation | 528107th of 112 | Single-core only |
| HTML5 Browser | 479104th of 112 | Single-core only |
| PDF Viewer | 633103rd of 112 | Single-core only |
| Photo Library | 399105th of 112 | Single-core only |
| Clang | 395106th of 112 | Single-core only |
| Text Processing | 398105th of 112 | Single-core only |
| Asset Compression | 435107th of 112 | Single-core only |
| HDR | 444107th of 112 | Single-core only |
| Photo Editor | 408105th of 112 | Single-core only |
| Ray Tracer | 473106th of 112 | Single-core only |
| Structure from Motion | 489107th of 112 | Single-core only |
| Game Physics | 369108th of 112 | Single-core only |
| Video Encoder | 419103rd of 112 | Single-core only |
| Audio Encoder | 489108th of 112 | Single-core only |
| Video Player | 424104th of 112 | Single-core only |

Rank among the 112 runs with Geekbench 7 workload scores. Bars are relative to the best run. Geekbench doesn't run every workload multi-core, so some rows only have a single-core score.

## Disk

| Block size | Read | Write | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4K | 49.5 MB/s (12,681 IOPS) | 49.6 MB/s (12,698 IOPS) | 99.1 MB/s (25,379 IOPS) |
| 64K | 386.4 MB/s (6,182 IOPS) | 388.5 MB/s (6,215 IOPS) | 774.9 MB/s (12,397 IOPS) |
| 512K | 344.4 MB/s (688 IOPS) | 362.7 MB/s (725 IOPS) | 707.1 MB/s (1,413 IOPS) |
| 1M | 724.7 MB/s (724 IOPS) | 772.9 MB/s (772 IOPS) | 1.46 GB/s (1,496 IOPS) |

fio random read and write, 50/50, run by YABS against the boot disk.

## Network

### IPv4 transfer speed

Loading...

| Target | Protocol | Send | Receive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Clouvider, London, UK (10G) | IPv4 | 458 Mbps | 2.76 Gbps |
| Leaseweb, NYC, NY, US (10G) | IPv4 | 451 Mbps | 2.76 Gbps |
| Leaseweb, Singapore, SG (10G) | IPv4 | 439 Mbps | 1.46 Gbps |

Public iperf3 servers vary in capacity and availability. Compare a target only with itself over time.

## Application workloads

### PostgreSQL transactions
Measured

Durable transfers and indexed account lookups against a fixed relational dataset.

PostgreSQL transactions measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | transactions/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 100 | 100 | 25.94 / 476.81 | 0 / 0 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 500 | 495.32 | 30.9 / 74.07 | 0 / 837 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 1000 | 968.24 | 104.29 / 532.07 | 0 / 5695 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 3000 | 1767.76 | 332.95 / 570.53 | 0 / 221657 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 100 | 99.79 | 25.41 / 449.12 | 0 / 0 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 500 | 492.73 | 46.03 / 611.75 | 0 / 1302 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 1000 | 969.89 | 102.22 / 481.58 | 0 / 4992 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 3000 | 1797.41 | 323.13 / 576.24 | 0 / 216248 | latency limit exceeded |

p95 ≤ 50 ms · p99 ≤ 100 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### PostgreSQL large dataset
Failed

The same transaction mix against ten million accounts; the dataset never shrinks to fit a plan.

RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError:

p95 ≤ 100 ms · p99 ≤ 250 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Redis cache
Measured

A mixed cache workload with 1 KiB values, expiration, misses and eviction.

Redis cache measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | operations/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1000 | 999.99 | 4.22 / 7.08 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 5000 | 4999.76 | 7.24 / 13.11 | 0 / 35 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 10000 | 9961.04 | 15.54 / 26.48 | 0 / 6945 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 25000 | 19992.78 | 20.01 / 26.48 | 0 / 901203 | load generator saturated |
| 2 | 1000 | 999.99 | 3.77 / 5.82 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 5000 | 4999.79 | 4.82 / 7.84 | 0 / 30 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 10000 | 9979.01 | 11.27 / 21.52 | 0 / 3753 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 25000 | 21249.95 | 18.21 / 24.13 | 0 / 674897 | load generator saturated |

p95 ≤ 10 ms · p99 ≤ 25 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Redis persistent queue
Measured

Enqueue, consume and acknowledge payloads with append-only persistence.

Redis persistent queue measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | jobs/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 100 | 100 | 10.45 / 14.28 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 500 | 499.98 | 16.22 / 26.21 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 1000 | 999.59 | 23.39 / 45.56 | 0 / 70 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 3000 | 2929.76 | 80.29 / 128.76 | 0 / 12587 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 100 | 100 | 11.27 / 15.06 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 500 | 499.98 | 17.83 / 27.03 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 1000 | 999.88 | 26.75 / 53.06 | 0 / 13 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 3000 | 2883.45 | 95.27 / 135.38 | 0 / 20812 | latency limit exceeded |

p95 ≤ 20 ms · p99 ≤ 50 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Discourse community
Failed

Signed-in reading, search, posting and replies in a populated Rails forum.

RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError:

p95 ≤ 1500 ms · p99 ≤ 3000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### n8n workflows
Measured

Webhook, transformation, branching and a verified final response.

n8n workflows measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | workflows/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 108.57 / 128.76 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 20 | 0 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 3600 / 0 | no completed operations |
| 1 | 50 | 0.27 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 7475 / 1475 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 100 | 0.23 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 8683 / 9274 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 662.52 / 1591.71 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 20 | 0 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 3600 / 0 | no completed operations |
| 2 | 50 | 0 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 7480 / 1520 | no completed operations |
| 2 | 100 | 0.02 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 9542 / 8455 | latency limit exceeded |

p95 ≤ 1000 ms · p99 ≤ 2000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### n8n queue workers
Measured

Completed queued workflows including waiting time and worker execution.

n8n queue workers measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | workflows/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 593.73 / 1706.61 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 20 | 10.63 | 9085.12 / 9085.12 | 1591 / 0 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 50 | 3.37 | 9085.12 / 9085.12 | 5341 / 3022 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 100 | 4.67 | 9085.12 / 9085.12 | 6283 / 10834 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 110.77 / 136.75 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 20 | 20 | 280.98 / 458.16 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 50 | 3.17 | 9085.12 / 9085.12 | 4959 / 3450 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 100 | 3.03 | 9085.12 / 9085.12 | 6221 / 11206 | latency limit exceeded |

p95 ≤ 2000 ms · p99 ≤ 4000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Ghost publishing
Measured

Readers, authenticated draft creation, publishing and image uploads.

Ghost publishing measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | journeys/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 911.31 / 1192.49 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 20 | 11.51 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 1453 / 0 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 50 | 0.63 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 6509 / 2374 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 100 | 0.64 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 6594 / 11287 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 739.27 / 929.64 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 20 | 17.45 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 357 / 0 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 50 | 0.6 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 6512 / 2375 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 100 | 0.65 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 6587 / 11291 | latency limit exceeded |

p95 ≤ 1000 ms · p99 ≤ 2000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Formbricks / Next.js
Insufficient RAM

Public survey rendering, persisted responses and authenticated analysis.

Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 1000 ms · p99 ≤ 2000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Elasticsearch search and ingestion
Insufficient RAM

Full-text search, filtering and aggregations while new documents are indexed.

Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 250 ms · p99 ≤ 500 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### GitHub self-hosted runner
Insufficient RAM

A pinned build and test workflow with separate cold and warm dependency caches.

Requires 8192 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 3600000 ms · p99 ≤ 3600000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Odoo Community sales
Insufficient RAM

Customer lookup, sales order confirmation, stock operations and reporting.

Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 2000 ms · p99 ≤ 4000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

## Advertised vs. measured

| Spec | Advertised | Measured |
| --- | --- | --- |
| vCPU | 2 | 2 |
| CPU | Shared vCPU | 16.6% of busy CPU time stolen |
| RAM | 2 GB | 1.9 GiB |
| Storage | 20 GB SSD | 18 GiB |
| Architecture | x86\_64 | x86\_64 |
| Virtualization | KVM | KVM |

Guests usually report slightly less RAM and disk than advertised because of kernel reservations and filesystem overhead.

## Detected hardware

**CPU model:** AMD EPYC 7281 16-Core Processor

**CPU cores:** 2

**CPU frequency:** 2096 MHz

**AES-NI:** Yes

**VM-x/AMD-V:** Yes

**RAM reported:** 1.9 GiB

**Swap reported:** 0 MiB

**Disk reported:** 18 GiB

**Virtualization reported:** KVM

**CPU steal:** 16.6% of busy CPU time stolen

**Distro:** Ubuntu 24.04.5 LTS

**Kernel:** 6.8.0-142-generic

**Architecture:** x86\_64

**IPv4 reachable:** Yes

**IPv6 reachable:** No

## Advertised at test time

**Plan:** DEV1-S

**Product line:** Development

**Location:** Paris 1

**vCPU:** 2 shared vCPU

**Architecture:** x86\_64

**RAM:** 2 GB

**Storage:** 20 GB SSD

**Virtualization:** KVM

**Network:** 200 Mbps

**Transfer:** Unmetered

**Port 25:** Unknown

**Monthly price at test time:** €6.55 EUR

**Hourly price at test time:** €0.0090 EUR

**YABS version:** v2026-09-20

**Ran at:** Oct 20, 2026, 20:40:14 UTC

**Parser version:** 5

## Run timeline

**Queued:** Oct 19, 2026, 21:43:00 UTC

**Server created:** Oct 20, 2026, 20:39:16 UTC

**First update from the server:** Oct 20, 2026, 20:39:16 UTC

**Completed:** Oct 21, 2026, 00:58:00 UTC

**Server deleted:** Oct 21, 2026, 00:58:00 UTC

**Cost of this run:** €0.039 EUR

Tests 37 of 39 done Live output 1061 lines

Setup 2 cores, 1.9 GiB RAM 4 of 4Done

Disk (fio) 104 MB/s at 4k, 1.57 GB/s at 1m 5 of 5Done

Network, IPv4 (iperf3) Median 451 Mbit/s send, 2.76 Gbit/s receive, 1 retried 3 of 3Done

Geekbench 7, single-core Score 456 18 of 18Done

Web apps 2 failed, 4 skipped 6 of 8Some failed

TestResultTime

PostgreSQL transactions 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 34m 12s

PostgreSQL large dataset RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: Stopped RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: 8m 13s

Redis cache 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 28m 51s

Redis persistent queue 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 28m 31s

Discourse community RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: Stopped RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: 23m 00s

n8n workflows 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 36m 40s

n8n queue workers 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 36m 06s

Ghost publishing 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 46m 29s

Formbricks / Next.js Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected. Not run Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected.

Elasticsearch search and ingestion Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected. Not run Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected.

GitHub self-hosted runner Requires 8192 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected. Not run Requires 8192 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected.

Odoo Community sales Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected. Not run Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1962 MiB detected.

Finish Results saved 1 of 1Done

Watch party 0 watching

This party closed at 01:58 UTC. It's read only now.

## Watch party

Loading the party