DigitalOcean Premium Intel 4 vCPU / 8 GB benchmarks

4 dedicated vCPU, 8 GB RAM, 100 GB NVMe

[Dedicated CPU](https://www.rackcensus.com/vps-categories/dedicated-cpu-vps-benchmarks)[CPU Optimized](https://www.rackcensus.com/vps-categories/cpu-optimized-vps-benchmarks)[High Performance](https://www.rackcensus.com/vps-categories/high-performance-vps-benchmarks)[NVMe Storage](https://www.rackcensus.com/vps-categories/nvme-storage-vps-benchmarks)

$122.00/mo

$0.18/hr

$132.53/mo at 730 hours

[Visit DigitalOcean](https://www.rackcensus.com/go/digitalocean)

Referral link. If you sign up through it, I may get paid. [How this works](https://www.rackcensus.com/transparency#referrals-heading)

# Performance by location
[Every run of this plan](https://www.rackcensus.com/benchmarks?filter%5Bplan%5D=digitalocean-c2-4vcpu-8gb-intel&filter%5Bsort%5D=location)

Medians over the last 90 days. Multi per $ is the multi-core median divided by the current monthly price, USD only.

Price position

Cheaper than 4% of 25 similar plans

Same vCPU count and CPU type, 6 to 11 GB RAM, median $84

| Location | Runs | GB7 single | GB7 multi | 4K IOPS | Price | Multi per $ | Last tested |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [New York 2](https://www.rackcensus.com/locations/new-york-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in New York") New York, NY, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $122.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| [New York 3](https://www.rackcensus.com/locations/new-york-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in New York") New York, NY, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $122.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| [San Francisco 2](https://www.rackcensus.com/locations/san-francisco-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in San Francisco") San Francisco, CA, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $122.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| [San Francisco 3](https://www.rackcensus.com/locations/san-francisco-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in San Francisco") San Francisco, CA, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $122.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |

A location is highlighted only when it leads the next best by 5 percent or more. Smaller gaps are normal run-to-run variance.

Network results are not compared here. iperf3 targets are third-party servers, so distance to each target dominates the number.